There is no right way
to write a book review. Book reviews are highly personal and reflect the
opinions of the reviewer. A review can be as short as 100 words, or as long
as 1,500 words, depending on the purpose of the review.
The following are
standard procedures for writing book reviews; they are only suggestions. Generally for magazines, the reviewer will have a biased slant due to audience. For example, a feminist magazine may take a feminist look at the work in question. Writing for a science fiction magazine about a romance novel might criticize the book with a bias. Be aware of this kind of bias when you read (and write) reviews. 
Generally, the process is as follows:
1. Write a
    statement giving essential information about the book: title, author, first
    copyright date, type of book, general subject matter, special features
    (maps, color plates, etc.), price and ISBN where appropriate. Since we are all using the same edition, don't worry too much about ISBN or price (it's out of date).
2. State the
    author’s purpose in writing the book. Sometimes authors state their
    purpose in the preface or the first chapter. When they do not, you may
    arrive at an understanding of the book’s purpose by asking yourself these
    questions:
a. Why did
        the author write on this subject rather than on some other subject?
b. From what
        point of view is the work written?
c. Was the
        author trying to give information, to explain something, to
        convince the reader, or to entertain?
d. What is
        the general field or genre, and how does the book fit into it?
        Knowledge of the genre means understanding the form and how it
        functions. Is this book a science fiction romance or a paranormal teen novel? For collections of short fiction like this consider the stories as a collection.
e. Who is the
        intended audience?
f. What is
        the author's style? Is it formal or informal? Evaluate the quality of
        the writing style by using some of the following standards: coherence,
        clarity, originality, forcefulness, correct use of technical words,
        conciseness, fullness of development, fluidity. Does it suit the
        intended audience and how might the author do that?
g. Scan the
        Table of Contents, it can help understand how the book is organized and
        will aid in determining the author's main ideas and how they are
        developed - chronologically, topically, etc.
g. How did
        the book affect you? Were any previous ideas you had on the subject
        changed, abandoned, or reinforced due to this book? How is the book
        related to your own course or personal agenda? What personal experiences
        you've had relate to the subject?
h. How well
        has the book achieved its goal?
i. Would you
        recommend this book or article to others? Why?
3. State the
    theme and the thesis of the book.
a. Theme:
        The theme is the subject or topic. It is not necessarily the title, and
        it is usually not expressed in a complete sentence. It expresses a
        specific phase of the general subject matter. In this collection why name the book after the specific story? (consider audience)
b. Thesis:
        The thesis is an author’s generalization about the theme, the author’s
        beliefs about something important, the book’s philosophical
        conclusion, or the proposition the author means to prove. Express it
        without metaphor or other figurative language, in one declarative
        sentence.
Example
Title: Alice's Misadventures Underground
General Subject
      Matter: Literary satire, parody, and humor
Theme: The corruption of youth
Thesis:
                    Adults corrupt the young with their ideas and schemes. 
4. Development. How does the author support her thesis?
a.  Description:
        The author presents word-pictures of scenes and events by giving
        specific details that appeal to the five senses, or to the reader’s
        imagination. Description presents background and setting. Its primary
        purpose is to help the reader realize, through as many sensuous details
        as possible, the way things (and people) are, in the episodes being
        described.
b. Narration:
        The author tells the story of a series of events, usually presented in
        chronological order. In a novel however, chronological order may be
        violated for the sake of the plot. The emphasis in narration, in both
        fiction and non-fiction, is on the events. Narration tells what has
        happened. Its primary purpose is to tell a story.
c. Exposition:
        The author uses explanation and analysis to present a subject or to
        clarify an idea. Exposition presents the facts about a subject or an
        issue as clearly and impartially as possible. Its primary purpose is to
        explain.
d. Argument:
        The author uses the techniques of persuasion to establish the truth of a
        statement or to convince the reader of its falsity. The purpose is to
        persuade the reader to believe something and perhaps to act on that
        belief. Argument takes sides on an issue. Its primary purpose is to
        convince.
5. Evaluate the
    book for interest, accuracy, objectivity, importance, thoroughness, and
    usefulness to its intended audience. Show whether the author's main
    arguments are true. Respond to the author's opinions. What do you agree or
    disagree with? And why? Explore issues the book raises.    Compare it with other books on similar subjects or other books by the same
    as well as different authors. Comment on parts of particular interest, and
    point out anything that seems to give the book literary merit. Relate the
    book to larger issues.
6. Try to find
    further information about the author - reputation, qualifications,
    influences, biographical, etc. - any information that is relevant to the
    book being reviewed and that would help to establish the author's authority.
    Can you discern any connections between the author's philosophy, life
    experience and the reviewed book? 
If your
    thesis has been well argued, the conclusion should follow naturally. It can
    include a final assessment or simply restate your thesis. Do not introduce
    new material at this point.
What to examine when reading and writing a fiction review: 
Character
1. From what sources
  are the characters seemingly drawn?
2. What is the
      author's attitude toward her characters?
3. Are the
      characters flat and stereotypical or three-dimensional and dynamic?
Theme
1. What is/are
      the major theme(s)?
2. How are they
      revealed and developed?
3. Is the theme
      traditional and familiar, or new and original?
4. Is the theme
      didactic, psychological, social, entertaining, escapist, etc. in purpose
      or intent?
Plot
1.How are the
      various elements of plot (eg, introduction, suspense, climax, conclusion)
      handled? In a collection, consider the placement of stories in the collection. 
Style
1. What are the
      "intellectual qualities" of the writing (e.g., simplicity,
      clarity)?
2. What are the
      "emotional qualities" of the writing (e.g., humour, wit,
      satire)?
3. What are the
      "aesthetic qualities" of the writing (e.g., harmony, rhythm)?
4. What
      stylistic devices are employed (e.g., symbolism, motifs, parody,
      allegory)?
5. How effective
      is dialogue?
Setting
1. What is the
      setting and does it play a significant role in the work?
2. Is a sense of
      atmosphere evoked, and how?
3. What scenic
      effects are used and how important and effective are they?
4. Does the
      setting influence or impinge on the characters and/or plot?
Further: 
Book Review advice
CLASS/HOMEWORK: Read the book. Consider these questions and tips when reading. Take notes on the stories you read.
Your book report will be longer and more involved depending on the kind of grade you want. If reviewing the whole book, the review should make it clear that the whole book was considered and examined closely in the review. If you opt for the lower grades, the length of your review will undoubtedly vary with complexity. See previous posts for details.